Sunday, August 5, 2018

National Board Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) Five Core Propositions, Where Are We In Public Rural Education?


           
National Board Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) Five Core Propositions, Where Are We In Public Rural Education?
          In reflection of the professional dispositions relative to professional practice known as National Board Standards we have five propositions. I would like to focus your attention towards the following action steps: teachers are committed to students and their learning, teachers know the subjects they teach and how to teach those subjects to students, teachers are responsible for managing and monitoring student learning, teachers think systematically about their practice and learn from experiences, and teachers are members of their learning communities. As I evaluate professional progress within teacher education I now use the above dispositions to guide my continuous improvement efforts. Teachers in America’s classrooms must continue to reflect, revisit, and improve current practices if we are to move our students closer to global readiness with a focus on STEM via Technical Education.

            One of the greater conversations that I continue to share with fellow educators is the preparation given within teacher readiness programs. Too often we see the same trends being implemented with a continuous level of failed practices and efficiency unmeasurable. Within my current administrative role as Educational Director for Career Technical Workforce Development I am finding that many educators who are entering the professional lack the traditional background needed in teacher education. For example, Methods Courses, Psychological Evaluation Classes, Special Education Classes, Classroom Management, etc.  With this, there are failed attempts in educating students towards their fullest learning potential because there are initial barriers on the front-end; the instructional readiness of the educator – teacher prep programs.

            The five-professional disposition/propositions are all tied to these areas that I have mentioned. Educators are trained, but the needs of our current students often require continued renewing of educational standards and practices. Recently I presented at a national conference among educators. I saw more new faces and younger faces but, yet I noticed the same trends and conversations. This reflects the valued placed on educator training. Nationally, we share the same concerns in regard to our students and wanting them to be successful. However, we are not making the steps in the better directions to improve our quality of professional practice. We often say what is the return on invest; well I see a need to require more on the front end in efforts of getting more on the back end.

            When I think of my personal strengths and weaknesses I think that I am fairly addressing my need to improve my practice. I hold a Bachelors’ Degree in Elementary, a Master of Education Degree in Educational Administration, an Educational Specialist Degree in Educational Administration and a Doctorate Degree in Educational Leadership. Post-doctoral I have a Master of Science Degree in Instructional Design and Technology as well as a Master of Science Degree in Higher Education. I am constantly preparing myself to be a better educator and leader by posturing my practices with relevance and recency. In my references to the dispositions I feel that I am planning, preparing, and improving my efforts personally but seeking additional and ongoing educational credentials. I often encourage my subordinates to do the same. We can not lead our students when our students have caught up with us educationally. The process is designed to lead and learn and in that fashion we as the educators must be able to direct and guide our students.

            As I give attention towards the technical (technology) side of teacher quality, student assessment, and achievement I focus again on the readiness of our educators. When I was assigned to my current position, I noticed that I did not have an academic credential in this area. My certification was general yet it allowed me to serve in this role as administrator of STEM Technical Education. However, I needed to do more. Therefore, I earned a degree in a STEM area which improved my technology proficiencies. In my advocacy I yet push my students and fellow educators to learn how to maximize the use of their technology at all cost. On this past week, I did something very simple, I had a conference call in place of a standard faculty/staff meeting. The concept was to allow everyone to be in their individual locations yet focusing on the business at hand. Some were eating, driving, watching television etc, but we were all joined to discuss our business matters and informational needs. The possibilities of improving teacher quality rests with professional learning. On tomorrow in my school district we are planning to have all educators take an assessment (WorkKeys) an assessment that all our students are required to take. This will give a very finite view as to what we expect of our students; can we also meet these expectations? Already, educators have called to see if they really must sit for this assessment. I am concluding this is how students feels when we issue assessment request to them. Are they prepared, do they know the content, did the educator provide ample learning opportunities, are just a few of the concerns?  

            In closing, I am very appreciative for the learning outcomes that I have been able to provide myself. They have prepared me to be a leader in education at best. I often self-assess to determine if I can meet the needs of my students and learning community. To do this without fail, requires that I work to improve my skills and dispositions addressed in the five-propositions for National Board Standards. Education does work but it works best when it is re-tooled towards meeting a shared outcome; student achievement.

Resources:

            Nieto, S. (Ed.). (2014). Why we teach now. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Rotherham, A. & Willingham, Dr. (2009). 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, 67 [1], 16-21.

            Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. 

Posted by:
Dr. Melvin Alonza Lowe, III, EdD
Educational Director - Macon County Public Schools
lowema@maconk12.org